As it grew, its significance in the economy of the world, in its connections to empire and trade, became predominant and its merchants and investors carved a new place for themselves in British society. The city was not just important in economic terms to England, Britain, and eventually a global empire—it attracted and nourished intellectuals and artists, playwrights and writers, scientists and natural historians, and provided the setting for the display of status, consumption of new goods, and the development of fresh tastes.
Positioned next to the political center of Westminster, it housed and provided a public stage for parliamentarians, political protesters, members of court, and the monarchy. At the same time, London provided opportunity to poor and un- or underemployed men and women to work, even if in professions or criminal activities outside or on the edges of social and moral norms of the period.
For those who struggled, there was charity and beneficence, and punishment and forced work or separation from families. The focus on social and economic history that shaped historical writing of the s into the s elevated local history but influenced the questions asked of the metropolitan center. The last several decades have brought a resurgence of interest in the history of London, in the important religious, cultural, economic, social, and political developments that marked its transformation over a few hundred years.
Most histories and literary studies of London focus on particular research themes and do not attempt a comprehensive overview. A few general works introduce readers to the city in many of its facets, often highlighting sensory perceptions and encouraging a sense of imagining being there.
Bucholz and Ward focuses on two centuries in evoking sights and sounds of the city. Inwood presents a general history beginning with the Romans and ending in the late 20th century, with a foreword from the author of Porter , which aims to bring urban history research to a wider audience in its social history of the city.
Popular works include Ackroyd , a work also not limited to the Early Modern period. A comparative overview of the city in Early Modern Europe is found in Friedrichs Ackroyd, Peter. London: The Biography. London: Chatto and Windus, Not focused on scholarly interests or themes but on the city and its neighborhoods; for a wide audience.
Concluding essay on sources. Bucholz, Robert O. London: A Social and Cultural History, — New York: Cambridge University Press, The best slippers for women. Can having nothing to wear cause anxiety? How to clean and care for your leather handbag. Where to find the best maternity clothes for a stylish pregnancy. Do you remember these most popular Zara items ever? These are the most pinned Zara outfits right now. But time was too short to put down roots. On Edward's death in , the changes were reversed easily by his Catholic half-sister, Mary Only Mary's devotion to the papacy which threatened the continued possession of former monastic property in the hands of those who had purchased it from the crown , and her determination to marry her cousin, Philip of Spain, provoked a half-hearted reaction.
English Protestantism was reduced once again to a persecuted remnant; many of its ablest figures taking refuge abroad, to avoid martyrdom - the fate of those whom remained behind. So, in Elizabeth acceded to a troubled throne, after a five-year period in which Catholicism had been re-established in England with little apparent difficulty. Although the changes of Mary's reign were now reversed once more, Elizabeth and her councillors were under no illusions that many of her subjects remained obstinately attached to the old ways.
It would be well into the last two decades of Elizabeth's long reign before it could be said with confidence that Protestantism was the religion of the majority in England. For the first decades those who opposed the religious policies of the Elizabethan government could take comfort from the evident insecurity of a regime embodied by a mature, childless Queen who obstinately refused to marry and whose nearest heir was the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots.
Had Elizabeth died early as she nearly did in , from smallpox , England too might have plunged into the same religious civil war convulsing neighbouring lands on the Continent.
Given this evident insecurity, it was with remarkable confidence that Elizabeth and her advisors addressed those complicated problems of domestic and foreign policy arising from a new restoration of Protestantism. The Church of England would remain, in the words of its Protestant critics, 'but halfly reformed'.
But Elizabeth balked at the introduction of the full Calvinist Church order urged upon her by foreign theologians and by some of the English exiles who, having withdrawn to the continent during Mary's reign, now returned to assist the new regime.
The English church retained Bishops and ecclesiastical vestments, which many of the hotter Protestants regarded as an unacceptable Popish survival. When in Elizabeth insisted upon uniformity in clerical attire, a substantial proportion of the English clergy up to ten per cent in London refused to submit and was deprived. Further attempts to move the Queen to a more perfect Reformation, whether by Parliamentary statute or subtle pressure from the bench of bishops, proved equally unavailing.
Despairing at the Queen's obstinacy and at the apparent indifference of broad sections of the population to the call to a godlier lifestyle, evangelicals took refuge in brotherhoods and congregations that became increasingly detached from the mainstream church.
The frustration of reform measures in the Parliaments of and led some into formal separation. In the latter years of Elizabeth's reign Puritanism gave way to sectarian non-conformity, and eventually into outright confrontation with the established church. But the numbers involved in such open dissidence were small, the vast majority of the godly preferring to remain in communion and to seek consolation in voluntary associations which provided an appropriate context for the puritan lifestyle.
And in the main, their choice was justified, for whatever their disappointment at Elizabeth's lack of godly zeal, England's general allegiance to the Protestant cause was not in doubt. Even from the beginning of the reign there were evident proofs of this in an ambitious foreign policy which led swiftly to confrontation with the leading Catholic powers.
By the last quarter of the century England was destined to play a pivotal role in the survival of Calvinist powers on the Continent, as they faced the most profound threat to their survival from a resurgent Catholicism. By the time Elizabeth's long reign came to an end in , English people had come to esteem their Church.
The trials of the last three decades had in a very real sense secured England's Protestant identity. Through a generation of conflict in which the enemy had been foreign, Catholic and dangerous, English people had come to identify their Church and Protestantism, as a cornerstone of their identity.
This was not manifested, necessarily, in any very profound grasp of the theological tenets of faith. While English readers seem to have been avid consumers of catechisms and other cheap volumes of religious instruction, their clergy, as elsewhere in Europe, continued to lament how shallow was their grasp of doctrine.
Yet the identification could be more subtle and oblique, but still very real. The Catholic festival year, for instance, had been gradually superseded by a calendar of new, largely unofficial and profoundly Protestant patriotic festivals: the defeat of the Armada, Crownation day, the date of Elizabeth's accession.
In they would be joined by 5 November, the date of the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot, proof, if proof were needed that Catholicism was still considered perfidious, deadly and deeply un-English.
0コメント